| |
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
| Á¦¸ñ |
European countries, the Swedish |
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ |
2019-12-20 |
| ÀÛ¼ºÀÚ |
European |
There is Á߰赿Æ÷ÀåÀÌ»ç some criticism of the privatised job council system, much of which centres on the idea that agencies don¡¯t do anything ·¹Çø®Ä«¿©¼ºÁö°©=·¹Çø®Ä«¿©¼ºÁö°© to help raise skill levels of employees not facing ±ºÆ÷¾ÆÆÄÆ®ÀÌ»ç layoffs, since these councils only work with people who have ²Äµ¥°¡¸£¼Û¿©¼ºÀÇ·ù=²Äµ¥°¡¸£¼Û¿©¼ºÀÇ·ù lost, or are about to lose, their jobs. Additionally, it¡¯s quite a bit harder to place job seekers who haven¡¯t recently been in the workforce, which generally means that skilled µð½ºÄù¾îµå¿©¼ºÀÇ·ù=µð½ºÄù¾îµå¿©¼ºÀÇ·ù workers partnering with the job security councils have a higher chance of getting a new position.
But, compared to other European countries, the Swedish system is efficient and has garnered attention internationally. The closest equivalent to the Swedish system is Germany¡¯s Transferma©¬nahmen, or ¡®transfer measures¡¯, in which support for laid-off workers is partly financed by the employer and partly by the state. However, this only applies to large companies. And in general, ¼ººÏÀϹÝÀÌ»ç current programmes in Europe more commonly focus on avoiding layoffs altogether, such as cuts in pay or working hours. In most countries, there exists no additional support for laid-off workers apart from state-run ´ä·Ê¶±=´ä·Êǰ ´ä·Ê¶± Çà»ç¶± ±îÄ¡¶± schemes. This applies in particular to the French system, but also to Belgium and the Netherlands, for example. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|